Thursday, 31 December 2015

Do You Know That Watching Movies Will Provide Stress And Strain Relief To Your Brain

If you are feeling suicidal or not proactive or loathed you can arrange to watch a movie to provide you relief and will sharp your brain also.Try these tricks or make a habit of watching interesting documentaries in form of large clips or horror large clips and you will find that you have saved yourself or relieved yourself from a demon which was destined to kill you or lose your faith.Scientists large years of research trying to find that certain rays from a cathode ray tube t.v or lcd t.v or anyother type of media device will affect your brain positively or negatively.But in the end they have find that making wise use of them through focus can relieve your brain rather than playing games or watching porn videos.

Created FCDViper 8989


Do You Know That Honda VTEC Is A Type Of Turbo

Due to engine displacement limitations in japan because higher displacement have no effect just more power from same block and burning great amount of gasoline is restricted.We all know that when honda engines go up from 5999rpm the vtec system is engaged this makes sure that there is not early closing of of intake valve or exhaust valve which provides maximum available thrust to honda vehicles.All vehicles other than honda provide some other technology to provide the same solution to problem which occurs at high rev`s engine.
These technologies are always provided to race type vehicles.That`s why a honda s2000`s have such a high hp rating from a small 2.0L 4 cylinder engine because when engine rev`s go up from 5999rpm VTEC is engaged which provides +50 more hp to honda vehicles.Turbo also does the same in a manner different from vtec system but with least efficiency which means it will provide more boost and torque than vtec but with burning great amount of your gasoline.So don`t be fooled by your honda that if provides more hp to you it doesn`t means that it is the best engine but it is made best compared to mazda which is best.Honda can not provide you as sharp made engines and drive as mazda can but mazda is not a smart player although it has sharp engines to provide you.The choice is your`s make your choice mazda or honda but i suggest you for long drives mazda is better.Also mazda engines are the most efficient engine`s in japanese automotive industry long before honda or toyota could have taken place.





Sunday, 27 December 2015

25 Worst Cars Ever Made

1966 Peel Trident

1966 Peel Trident

This Car, if you want to call it a car,  is the 1966 Peel Trident. Sure, as a kid growing up, this would have been a cool car.  It's about as close as we're ever going to get to "The Jetson's".

The 1966 Peel Trident was only 4'2" long, so really it was just a glorified soapbox car.  Don't even get us started on that bubble that they call a "roof".  Could you imagine driving that down through Texas in the middle of the summer? I don't think they make a sunblock strong enough for that!!
 1981 De Lorean DMC-12

1981 De Lorean DMC-12

The 1981 De Lorean DMC-12 was one of those cars that only made it on the map due to the fact that it appeared in a hit movie that most of us watch until this day. Yes, we're taking about the "Back to the Future" saga, where it was turned into a time traveling car. Asides from the movie series, this car wasn't known for how good it was.

In fact, in all reality, the 1981 De Lorean DMC-12 was extremely under powered for how much it weighed. On top of that, it was only running on a 2.8-liter Peugeot V6 engine and the car came with a hefty price tag!! You definitely didn't get your bang for your buck when you bought one of these
  1949 Crosley Hotshot

1949 Crosley Hotshot

The 1949 Crosley Hotshot was the first sports car produced post WW2. The car was actually the biggest piece of garbage created during its time.  Okay, well maybe it wasn't "Big" being that it only weighed 1100 lbs and was only 145 inches in length. Surprisingly this atrocity actually won the "index of performance".

The major downfall of the 1949 Crosley Hotshot was most definitely the engine.  It had a dual overhead cam,  0.75L 4 cylinder engine. The problem?  The engine wasn't made with cast iron. Instead it was put together with with pieces of stamped tin. As many of us know, once tin heats up, it's not the most reliable! Overtime, this engineering flaw would cause the welds to let go, which would cause some extreme noise AND heat!

1911 Overland OctoAuto

1911 Overland OctoAuto

The 1911 Overland OctoAuto was by far one of the most useless cars ever designed.  Sure,  nowadays vehicles are getting larger and larger.  We're even seeing jacked up trucks with 6 wheels and even six doors.  With family sizes growing now, we can somewhat see a mild use for something like that, but back in 1911 there was absolutely no use for a vehicle with EIGHT wheels.
 Especially when four of them were mounted in the front... The 1911 Overland OctoAuto was 20 feet long.  That's longer than most of our full sized trucks nowadays! The 1911 Overland OctoAuto was displayed at the very first Indianapolis 500 and received exactly ZERO orders!  We can't begin to wonder why...
 1971 Ford Pinto

1971 Ford Pinto

Much like the 1961 Corvair, the 1971 Ford Pinto was another car with its engine mounted in the rear. The difference?  The 1971 Ford Pinto was by far more deadly than any car ever created.  Even the slightest nudge to the back end of this car could turn it into a volatile disaster. Back in the day, it was almost as if Ford had no interest at all in the safety of the consumer.

Why do we say this?  Well mainly because, it would have cost $121 million to reinforce the rear end of the car, as opposed to the $50 million it would cost to buyout the dissatisfied customers.  Needless to say, if you're one of the people still driving the 1971 Ford Pinto, you must have a death wish!
 1957 Waterman Aerobile

1957 Waterman Aerobile

The 1957 Waterman Aerobile was a car that could actually fly.  Yes, we said fly... It had two wheels mounted in the back with one wheel in the front. It also had a set of wings, but anything that flies has wings right? On top of the extremely odd look of this "car", it also had a propeller mounted on the back of the fuselage to give it that extra "push".

Needless to say, the only people who bought the 1957 Waterman Aerobile were the ones with a death wish.  The car did manage to go down in history and is sitting in the Smithsonian.  Thankfully it is now out of harms way.  Or shall we say "Mankind is now out of harms way!"
 1981 Cadillac Fleetwood V-8-6-4

1981 Cadillac Fleetwood V-8-6-4

The 1981 Cadillac Fleetwood V-8-6-4 was GM's first attempt at a variable displacement design. Honestly, the idea was perfect. Why do we need all of our cylinders running while we're sitting in place? We really don't, and that was the main idea when they thought of this car. They wanted to create a car that would shut down various cylinders when you were idling. The concept worked to a point, but with success comes some flaws.
The 1981 Cadillac Fleetwood V-8-6-4 would end up jerking, bucking, stalling, and it would even make some pretty abrupt noises. Many people would bring their car in to get the displacement system removed. Most of them never went back to Cadillac again!
 1958 Zunndapp Janus

1958 Zunndapp Janus

The 1958 Zunndapp Janus was a German engineered car that somewhat represented a misshapen jellybean.  It was powered by a 250 cc,  14 horsepower engine.  When all said and done, this car could top out at a maximum of 50 MPH.

Not only would the 1958 Zunndapp Janus hold up traffic everywhere it went, but they designed it so that anyone sitting in the back seat could see the expressions on the faces of the drivers behind them!  I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to be riding in that back seat when it got rear ended!

1920 Briggs and Stratton Flyer

1920 Briggs and Stratton Flyer

The 1920 Briggs and Stratton Flyer was by far the most useless "Automobile"  of its time.  By the 1920's,  the automotive world was no longer in the experimental stages.  Many of the big names were already pushing out high end luxury cars. With that being said, it's quite obvious that they were just trying to make a quick buck with this ridiculous design.

 The 1920 Briggs and Stratton Flyer literally had no design, no body and no windshield. To top it off,  it had FIVE wheels and was powered by a measly 2HP engine. You could probably walk faster than this monstrosity could drive!!
1997 Plymouth Prowler

1997 Plymouth Prowler

Over the course of time, Plymouth has created many reputable cars, but at the same time they've also created quite a few that shouldn't have even been a drawing on a piece of paper. The 1997 Plymouth Prowler would happen to be one of those cars that just didn't make the cut. We can understand the idea of bringing back the old "Roadster" look, but seriously if you're going to try and bring back something as renowned as a roadster, at least make sure it could match up to the originals.

The 1997 Plymouth Prowler had the look of an old school roadster. Heck, even as we were growing up, we thought this car looked cool. That was until we found out that they barely pushed 250HP and that they were only made with an automatic transmission. If you're going to have a car like this, wouldn't you want to burn a little rubber? Needless to say, the 1997 Plymouth Prowlers bark was much worse than its bite!!

1961 Corvair

1961 Corvair

The 1961 Corvair was literally a death trap on wheels.  Everything about this atrocity was a disaster waiting to happen.  To start, they mounted a flat six engine in the rear of the car.  Anyone knows that if you have more weight in the back that you're more likely to spin out. That wasn't the biggest issue with the engine placement though.  If you got into a fender Bender, it could turn ugly really quick.

If that wasn't enough for you, the 1961 Corvair also had a single piece steering column.  As if worrying about your engine exploding behind you wasn't enough, you had to worry about your steering column impaling you in a front end collision.  No wonder this car was deemed "Unsafe at any speed."
 1975 Triumph TR7

1975 Triumph TR7

The 1975 Triumph TR7 was one of the most poorly designed cars ever created. There was more of them off the road or in the shop getting fixed than there was on the road. If something could go wrong with this car, it would! The 1975 Triumph TR7 was the epitome of how a car should never be made. The car would short circuit more than a laptop that just had coffee spilt on it. The carburetors had to be constantly attended to in order to keep them balanced. Timing chains were snapping left, right and centre .

Both the oil and water pumps would refuse to pump correctly. If that wasn't enough, the sunroof would leak more than the oil in a Civic. At times, the headlights wouldn't flip open either. On one occasion there was even reports that the back axle fell right off. It's not a wonder as to why the 'Triumphs' were the last of their kind to be sold in America

1933 Fuller Dymaxion

1933 Fuller Dymaxion

The 1933 Fuller Dymaxion was designed by R. Buckminster Fuller.  As you can tell by the design of this "Blimp on wheels", he was definitely one of the greatest whack jobs of the century. For some reason Fuller had dreams that this car would eventually be able to adapt wings and take flight.  Needless to say, even to this day we don't have an actual "flying car".
The "Aerodynamic"  body work of the 1933 Fuller Dymaxion was meant to increase fuel efficiency and top speed.  It sported a rear mounted v8 engine,  was front wheel drive and only had THREE wheels (Two in the front, One in the back). All of the steering was controlled by the back wheel which was capable of a 90 degree steering lock. Due to this design the 1933 Fuller Dymaxion did not handle well at all at high speeds.
 1985 Yugo GV

1985 Yugo GV

If you're into rebuilding cars, the 1985 Yugo GV would be your perfect match. Not only was it created by the same person who made the Bricklin SV1, but the quality of this car was by far ALOT worse. To start with, the way the exterior was put together was as if it was built in a kindergarten class. Don't even get us started on the interior... Seriously, since when was "carpet" a standard feature?

If you managed to drive your 1985 Yugo GV off the lot, it was only a matter of time before the electrical would start shorting out and the engine would be a useless piece of scrap metal. If you were lucky enough that neither of those happened to you, then you were probably dealing with random exterior parts falling off all the time. This lemon of a car wouldn't be our first choice of transportation, that's for sure!!

1961 Amphicar

1961 Amphicar

The 1961 Amphicar was and probably still is one of the most unique cars ever created. Not only could it serve as a car on land, but it was a boat on water. One major issue with the car was that it only had a maximum speed of 7mph. Now think, they sold around 4000 of these things... That means 4000 more cars to be the cause of road rage.   That wasn't the only problem though.

Even though the 1961 Amphicar was also classified as a boat, that didn't mean that it had to be water tight. For this car to be able to stay afloat, it relied on a pump to keep up with any leakage.  Are you kidding me?!

1980 Corvette 305

1980 Corvette 305 "California"

The first thing we think of when we hear the name" Corvette", is that it's going to be a high powered beast capable of insane top speeds. Unfortunately for the 1980 Corvette 305 "California", this was not the case. During the 1970's emissions laws started to increase. One of the biggest industries targeted was the American Muscle Cars.

With new emissions laws in effect, the 1980 Corvette 305 "California" took a big hit. They were required to replace the Chevy small block engine with a 305 V8. This inadequate engine only put out a maximum of 180hp. For a Corvette, that's disgraceful!! Until this day, they probably still regret putting their name on this joke of a muscle car
1975 Morgan Plus 8 Propane

1975 Morgan Plus 8 Propane

If you thought that the Pinto was a poorly designed and dangerous car, you obviously have never heard about the 1975 Morgan Plus 8 Propane! To start off, did they realize that they were in the 70's?! Everything about the exterior of the car gives off the vibe that this car was actually built in the 1930's. It had all the classic traits of the cars created 40 years prior including wing fenders, wooden-frame bodies, and sliding-pillar front suspensions. But guess what?

That's not the worst thing about the 1975 Morgan Plus 8 Propane.  Someone thought that it would be a bright idea to run the v8 engine off of a propane bottle.  The worst part about the concept was that the propane bottle hung freely behind the rear bumper! I don't know about you, but we wouldn't want to be in that car when it got rear ended!!

1956 Renault Dauphine

1956 Renault Dauphine

The 1956 Renault Dauphine had to be one of the biggest wastes of money in the 1950's. At first they were going to call this piece of junk the "Corvette"... Thankfully they decided against that because to us nowadays a Corvette is meant to be a fast car and this thing was far from fast!  It would take you 32 seconds to reach a speed of 60mph. Like seriously, my grandmother could do that faster on her scooter! But with such a horrible engine, it was inevitable that the body would be horrible as well.

 The 1956 Renault Dauphine was paper thin. Some even said that when you stood next to one, you could hear the car rusting.  I'm sorry, but that's not our cup of tea!
1982 Camaro Iron Duke

1982 Camaro Iron Duke

The 1982 Camaro Iron Duke was another one of those muscle cars that should have never been classified as a muscle car. This car was an absolute disgrace to both Chevy and the muscle car industry. It may have been cool to have 90 horsepower at one point in time, but the 1980's was not that time!! If Chevy wanted to compete with the Ford Mustang, they were going to have to do alot better than a 2.5-liter, four-cylinder engine.

The 1982 Camaro Iron Duke also had a measly little 3-speed transmission. To top it all off, it would take the "muscle car" 20 seconds to go from 0-60 MPH. My grandmothers Prius is faster than that! 

1975 Bricklin SV1

1975 Bricklin SV1

The 1975 Bricklin SV1 was just an oversized door stop that was made completely out of a hard dent resistant plastic. As you can imagine, that much plastic would weigh the vehicle down. Heck, each bumper would add a couple hundred pounds to the car. To top it off, the 1975 Bricklin SV1 came equipped with a set of Gullwing doors that weighed 100lbs a piece.

Sure, they looked cool, but with time the parts would give out and the doors would begin to get heavier.  For an average person, this would end up causing issues. With the car weighing in at about as much as a tank, it's not a wonder that the v8 engine couldn't keep up.  You could have probably passed the 1975 Bricklin SV1 on a pedal bike!!
 1958 Lotus Elite

1958 Lotus Elite

At first glance, the 1958 Lotus Elite was a pretty snazzy looking car for its time.  Well actually, it was even a decent race car.  The car weighed no more than 1100 lbs and sported a 75 horsepower Coventry Climax Engine.  Now you're probably wondering how this car managed to weigh so little.  That brings us to the main flaw of the 1958 Lotus Elite.

Back in the 1950's, fibreglass was the lightest material on the market.  The founding engineer for the Lotus company was a nut job when it came to weight reduction.  Once he got his hands on it, it was all over. The body of the 1958 Lotus Elite was completely made of fibreglass.  Overtime, the suspension mounts would punch through the unreinforced fibreglass.  It seems the flaw in the design would later lead to the end of its production!

1974 Ford Mustang II

1974 Ford Mustang II

Needless to say, the 1974 Ford Mustang II shouldn't even be classified as a Mustang. In all reality it's just a rebuilt Ford Pinto, and we all know exactly how well those cars did. The 1974 Ford Mustang II was a huge disappointment for both consumers and for the Ford Motor Company. When you think about Mustangs, what's the first thing that comes to mind?

For us, it would be the raw power of an American Muscle Car. Unfortunately anyone that was expecting the 1974 Ford Mustang II to have power got greatly let down. 1974 was the only year that consumers didn't have the option of putting a V8 Engine into a Mustang (Unless you were in Mexico) . That was by far one of the biggest let downs of the 1974 Ford Mustang II, and it's the main reason it made the list!
 1970 AMC Gremlin

1970 AMC Gremlin

The 1970 AMC Gremlin is one of those cars that you wish had never been thought up. There obviously wasn't much thought put into the design of this monstrosity.  It's pretty much a butchered AMC Hornet.  It comes with the long nose and all.  Everything about the 1970 AMC Gremlin was so disproportionate that it even makes a SmartCar look good!  This tiny car had an EXTREMELY heavy six cylinder engine and the rear suspension had no travel at all.

Between the engine weight and lack of suspension, the 1970 AMC Gremlin was one of the most uncomfortable cars to take on a long cruise! 
1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Diesel

1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Diesel

The 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Diesel was by far one of our least favorite cars ever made.  Back then the 5.7L V8 Cutlass Diesel was bad enough, but when they introduced the 4.3L Version of the engine, things began to get worse.

The 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Diesel could only put out a maximum of 90HP before it would burst into Shrapnel.  We don't know about you, but we wouldn't have wanted to be driving in this car when the engine decided to blow!!
 2016 Ford Mustang

2016 Ford Mustang

Since the beginning of time, the Ford Mustang has always been an iconic car. To most, being able to own an old fastback is a dream, but with Mustangs being what they are, their price never depreciated. In fact, it seems that the older the car the more it's worth. Well over the last decade or so, the look of the Mustang has slowly been going from "American muscle" to "import tuner".

It finally became too much when Ford revealed the prototype for the 2016 Ford Mustang. At first, second, and fiftieth glance, all we can think about when we seen this horrendous car is a rounded Toyota Supra... Ford really did it this time. They may have ruined the way our children are going to look at muscle cars!!

Thanks for Reading!

Thanks for Reading!





Saturday, 26 December 2015

See Why Honda Insight 2015 Beats Toyota Prius 2015 In Every Insight And Outsight Value 

















Although Toyota Gives You A More Powerful High Range Battery And Superb Resale Value then Honda But See Why Honda Insight Is All away much better than Toyota`s Big Cat Prius.


Honda Gives You A 101V nickel metal Hydride battery in it`s insight(lower range)while Toyota gives you a 144V nickel hydride battery(higher range).
  •  Toyota Gives You good reliability and great resale value while honda lags behind. 
  • Honda Has somewhat sporty and robust insight while toyota gives you all features and generality of a great hybrid powertrain and chassis.
  • Toyota has great efficiency and emissions safety while honda again keeps backward.
  • No matter if you gonna go for general superior value hybrid car with synergy features Toyota dominates you.
  • If you want a great sporty but yet not a general hybrid car honda dominates you. 
  • In the end Honda may lag behind in general features and resale value of a hybrid car but honda gives you highly aerodynamic and sporty hybrid car which can be not bad if compared to toyota neglecting reliability and general features.

Wednesday, 23 December 2015

   Karma Automotive partners with BMW for powertrains

2012 Fisker Karma  



Now in the process of rising from the ashes of Fisker, the newly renamed Karma Automotive has announced a powertrain supply deal with BMW. Only instead of Karma providing BMW with technologies (as Tesla has for Daimler and Toyota), this deal goes the other way around. It is BMW that will be providing Karma with its powertrain components moving forward.
Little in the way of specifics was disclosed regarding precisely what the supply deal will entail. However according to the statement below, it will include "high voltage battery charging systems and a wide range of hybrid and EV systems." BMW has demonstrated its competence in developing and manufacturing such components with vehicles like the i3 and i8, and ActiveHybrid versions of the 3 Series, 5 Series, and 7 Series sedans.

Karma Automotive is what Chinese component manufacturer Wanxiang renamed the company formerly known as Fisker Automotive once it acquired the rights to the company and the Fisker Karma which it previously produced. The brand name, however, remained the property of Henrik Fisker's coachbuilding operation. The original Fisker Karma was powered by a 2.0-liter turbo four supplied by General Motors, with a lithium-ion battery pack from A123 systems.



Nissan, BMW build fast-charging EV stations in 19 states

U.S. electric-car drivers have access to an additional 120 DC electric fast-charging stations nationwide thanks to a partnership between BMW and Nissan.
The chargers are in 19 states, including California, Florida, New York and Ohio.
The automakers said today in a news release that the stations come equipped with CHAdeMO and CCS (Combo) chargers, which can be used on any electric vehicle equipped with fast-charge ports. Electric vehicles can be charged up to 80 percent within 30 minutes at the stations, the companies said.
“Together with Nissan, we are focused on facilitating longer distance travel so that even more drivers will choose to experience to convenience of e-mobility for themselves,” said Cliff Fietzek, BMW of North America’s Connected eMobility manager, in a statement.
The joint project is part of a promotion plan for two of the companies’ electric vehicles -- the BMW i3 and the Nissan Leaf -- during a year in which demand for EVs and hybrids has softened.
Sales of the Leaf electric subcompact, the best-selling electric car globally, have dropped 41 percent to 15,922 vehicles through November this year, compared with the same period in 2014.
BMW has been able to buck the trend this year with the i3, which debuted in 2013. It has sold 9,602 of the electric subcompact cars through November this year, a rise of 89 percent compared with the same period last year.
Drivers of the i3 can use its in-vehicle navigation system or the BMW i Remote app to locate the new hargers, while Nissan drivers can use the automaker’s EZ-Charge smartphone app.

Tuesday, 15 December 2015

Genesis of Genesis: 5 Reasons Why the Hyundai Luxury Spinoff Will Work

 hyundaigenesis5.0 

In early November, Hyundai announced that it would be splitting the Genesis luxury sedan off into its own brand. It then dropped the curtain on the newest flagship of the newly spun-off Genesis franchise. These moves were expected, but were also the absolute right thing to do for Hyundai to continue its campaign of establishing the Korean automaker as a legitimate rival to big-name luxury players in the market. Here’s why.

Perfect Time to Grow

01-hyunda-genesis-g90 

Hyundai has come a long way since its humble entry into the U.S. market in 2008. It now has the strongest product portfolio in the brand’s history, with attractive offerings such as the new Tucson and popular Sonata. And those products are so strong on their own, they do not need the gravitas of a car like the Genesis pull buyers into dealerships. These cars can stand on their own four wheels, so to speak.

Positioned for Success

00-hyunda-genesis-g90 When the Genesis first debuted it had style that amounted to an upscale, rear-wheel drive Sonata. With this current generation—and its big, bold grille—the Genesis as developed a style all its own. Hyundai has shown that it is following the trend of automakers like Audi and BMW, where the front end design of many of its vehicles look very alike. It would be pretty hard to have that design philosophy for every vehicle except for its flagship sedan. Meanwhile Hyundai is not forcing dealers to create standalone showrooms for its Genesis brand (if a dealer thinks its own showroom would be more successful in that market, they have the option), which is a smart, low-cost approach.

 

The Most Important Part of Chevy’s New Malibu? A New Turbo Engine

Source: Chevrolet

Back when we first started talking about the redesigned 2016 Chevy Malibu, we admitted that while it may not be the most invigorating car out there, its last major redesign in 2008 was “a huge improvement over the previous generation,” and the current generation “kept the Malibu moving in the right direction.” But while it may have improved in both interior and exterior styling updates, it continued to get trounced in both the performance and legroom departments when compared to competitors like the latest Accord, Camry, and Sonata.
Rolling onto lots across America as we speak, the 2016 Chevy Malibu will be offered in L, LS, LT and Premier trims, as well as a Hybrid model. Maybe GM has finally started paying closer attention to its target market instead of just eyeing the competition, or perhaps it knows that it needs a fresh home run courtesy of an all-out assault on every other midsize sedan out there. Either way, the Detroit-based automaker has made the 2016 Malibu a very different car in so many ways, starting with its available powertrains.

2016 Chevrolet Malibu
While everyone wants to flip out about the new Malibu finally having a hybrid option, with its electric side offering speeds that top 55 miles per hour and 47 miles per gallon combined, we have something a bit more invigorating in mind.
Taking notes from the success it has seen with the youthful Trax, Chevy has outfitted the new Malibu with a 1.5-liter, turbocharged four-banger that makes 160 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. Boasting economy numbers that borderline 27 miles per gallon in the city and 37 miles per gallon on the highway, this turbocharged pipsqueak of a powerplant appears to walk the tight line between zippy and efficiency, but it isn’t the only boosted option available on the 2016 Malibu. For anyone hungering for a bit more grunt, the 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine from the previous generation remains available, making 250 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque while offering a slightly softer 22 miles per gallon city and 32 miles per gallon average on the highway.

Monday, 14 December 2015

Top 10 Least Expensive Midsize Sedans for 2015

 

If sales charts are any indication, the midsize sedan is our nation's vehicle choice for family transportation. With spacious cabins, ample cargo capacity and a wide range of amenities, these cars brim with family-friendly features. They're also loaded with value, since many picks in this segment offer a wide array of features for a relatively low price.
If you're shopping in this segment and face a tight budget, we'd recommend checking out the list below. These are the 10 least expensive midsize sedans for 2015.
Our list includes picks for many types of midsize-sedan shoppers. The Mazda 6 offers a sporty driving experience. With the Kia Optima, you get assertive sheet metal that makes a statement. The Subaru Legacy comes with standard all-wheel drive, making it an excellent choice for those who frequently face rough weather. And the Volkswagen Passat's roomy rear seats make it a useful pick for families hauling long-limbed teens in the second row.
We've listed each sedan's MSRP, but remember that the prices shown reflect those of base models. You may have to invest a bit more to get the options you desire.
Be sure to visit our Incentives and Rebates page to learn about current incentive and rebate offers before you buy.  You might also find the vehicle you're interested in offered through Edmunds.com's Price Promise® program.


  1.  1. 2015 Volkswagen Jetta — $16,215






  2. 2015  Nissan Sentra  2. 2015 Nissan Sentra — $16,480
  3. 2015  Dodge Dart  3. 2015 Dodge Dart — $16,495
  4. 2015  Chevrolet Cruze  4. 2015 Chevrolet Cruze — $17,745
  5. 2015  Volkswagen Passat  5. 2015 Volkswagen Passat — $21,120
  6. 2015  Hyundai Sonata  6. 2015 Hyundai Sonata — $21,150
  7. 2015  Mazda 6  7. 2015 Mazda 6 — $21,190
  8. 2015 Kia  Optima  8. 2015 Kia Optima — $21,650
  9. 2015  Subaru Legacy  9 .2015 Subaru Legacy — $21,695
  10. 2015  Chrysler 200  10. 2015 Chrysler 200 — $21,700










Sunday, 13 December 2015

After 40 years, BMW's 3 series rules a tougher league

Changing market pose serious challenges

6 generations of BMW 3s
BMW's 3 series was "the first modern sports sedan," according to Florian Moser, head of BMW Group Classic. A history of the 3 series:
GEN 1
Global sales: 1,364,039
Production: 1975-82
• 3-series 2-door sedan debuts with 4-cylinder inline engine; adds 6-cylinder engine in 1977
GEN 2
Global sales: 2,339,251
Production: 1982-94
• 4-door sedan, awd 325ix and station wagon added; M3 high-performance model debuts in 1986
GEN 3
Global sales: 2,745,780
Production: 1990-2000
• True coupe added; becomes basis for first BMW-produced convertible*
• Shortened 3-series 3-door launched in the U.S. in 1995 as 318ti; discontinued in 2000
GEN 4
Global sales: 3,266,885
Production: 1998-2007
• 3 series gains features from the 7 series: instrument panel, side airbags in rear, navigation. Extensive use of aluminum and high-strength steel.
GEN 5
Global sales: 3,102,345
Production: 2005-13
• Upgrade in engine technology with a 3.0-liter, inline 6-cylinder engine with TwinPower turbo. 4-cylinder models feature brake energy generation and stop-start.
GEN 6
Global sales: 1,756,000**
Production: 2012-present
• BMW splits nomenclature: 4-door remains 3 series; 5-door is GT; 2-door convertible and coupe are 4 series; 4-door with coupelike styling is Gran Turismo.
Source: BMW
*Factory-authorized convertibles by Baur, a German coachbuilder, were offered earlier
**Through September 2015; includes 4 series
In 1975, BMW introduced the 3 series, a sporty sedan that became synonymous with the brand's performance image.
Forty years later, despite intensifying competition and changing customer tastes, the 3 series still dominates its segment. Competitors openly benchmark the 3 series and target it in their advertising. Buff books lavish it with praise. Dealers love the repeat business.
In many ways, the 3 series is BMW, the brand with the enviable mystique built on German engineering and uncompromised performance.
But the competition is coming on strong; some experts say the Mercedes-Benz C class and Cadillac ATS are already on par with the 3 series when it comes to technology and performance. The next-generation Audi A4 due next year could be another tough rival.
The question is whether BMW can maintain the 3 series' performance aura in a market demanding more luxury, connectivity, semiautonomous driving technology and increased fuel economy.
BMW can't afford not to.
The 3 series accounts for about 25 percent of BMW sales worldwide, the automaker says. In the United States, 501,569 luxury compact cars were sold last year, and the 3 series (and its spinoff 4 series) accounted for nearly 28 percent of those sales -- a percentage BMW has maintained seven out of the last 10 years.
Dealers testify to the nameplate's market strength.
"I've had repeat buyers over and over again. Over the years, the 3 series has evolved, and the technology has evolved, but they have not rested on their laurels," says Joe Laham, owner of BMW of Cape Cod in Massachusetts.
Laham, who sells 10 other brands including Audi and Volvo, says rivals have a hard time conquesting 3-series buyers.
"Everybody has tried to benchmark it," he says. "I do value my partners, but it is tough to compete with the legend."

Lutz: At the creation
The legend has been decades in the making. Fabled executive Bob Lutz joined BMW in 1971 as the board member for global sales and marketing and helped create that aura.
Lutz was there when the 3 series was launched and when BMW's tag line "Aus Freuden am Fahren" ("For the Joy of Driving") became "The Ultimate Driving Machine."
"We blessed it as conveying exactly the right blend of superiority and excellence," Lutz says. "It was the BMW promise that nobody else could make."
Lutz: 'Well-earned' image

In the last five years, mechanically and with performance, other cars have caught up to the 3 series, he says: "What hasn't disappeared is the reputation and the brand image. It is not totally reflected by reality, but it was well-earned in a 35-year history producing good and desirable cars."
It's an enviable position, admits Johan de Nysschen, president of Cadillac, a brand that wants to dethrone the 3 series. BMW's mystique is the result of "many generations of consistency," one that Cadillac is seeking to emulate, he adds.
De Nysschen believes General Motors' brand can compete, but the perception of Cadillac as a true player will come with "consistent execution. We will see a change in five years."
"My former employer Audi are respected today. They did not get there overnight; it has taken them 20 to 25 years, and our journey will not be that long."
But he concedes it is hard to dislodge an image as strong as the 3 series': "They have embodied that in their product and developed this intangible aura and an appeal that has much intangible value. People imagine the car is much greater than it is."
There is some support for de Nysschen's opinion.
Although the 3 series has reached "that pinnacle level and has maintained it," says Stephanie Brinley, an analyst with IHS Automotive in Detroit, "I am not sure that BMW has progressively improved the 3 series as much as others have improved their cars."

'Driver focus'
Other experts say competitors still are far from matching the 3 series' "driver focus," as Tim Urquhart, an analyst with IHS in London, puts it. "It consistently beats its rivals on that."
Jean Jennings, editor of jeanknowscars.com and former editor of Automobile magazine, figures there are "at least a half-dozen competitors" vying for the 3 series' crown. Yet the 3 won an Automobile All-Star award 29 years in a row -- more than any other car, Jennings says.
She'd place odds on Mercedes-Benz and Audi coming close in sales. "If Porsche decided to make a four-door sedan in that size, it would probably wipe it up," Jennings adds.
BMW says it has sold 14.6 million 3-series models (including the 4 series coupe and convertible spun off from the 3 series) worldwide since the car went on sale in 1975. Of those, more than 11 million were sedans or station wagons.
Stephan Kessel, BMW AG's head of production management for the 3 and 4 series, says that track record makes the 3 series "the heart of the brand. Most of the values that BMW stands for are in the 3 series. It is an ambassador."
The 3 series has added significance in the U.S.: BMW of North America was founded 40 years ago when the brand took over the sales and distribution of its vehicles from independent distributors.
Sattig: Dynamic driving feeling

"When we decided to open our own division in the U.S., that was at the same time that BMW released the most important car as a company," says Manuel Sattig, head of brand strategy in the United States.
The 3 series is the epitome of BMW's marketing as the ultimate driving machine "because it is related to that feeling when you shift the gears and that direct response of using the gas pedal -- it gives you that dynamic driving feeling," Sattig says.
Even Consumer Reports sings the 3 series' praises.
Jake Fisher, the magazine's director of auto testing, says: "It has for a very long time been The One. This is the small, fun-to-drive, luxurious vehicle, and it hasn't had a lot of competition for quite a while."
Lutz says a key to the success of the 3 series is that "it was always superbly engineered."
"It was engineered up to a desirable level as opposed to engineered down to a specific cost," he says. "People expected to pay more."
"That is where the slogan came from. The focus in marketing and the car was on vehicle dynamics, good brakes, sharp handling and good engine sound -- all of the things that provide gratification to the driver."
Urquhart of IHS says the competition has intensified in the last two decades, "but the 3 series is still the benchmark."
With the redesigned C class launched last fall, the Mercedes-Benz sedan "is beginning to close that gap" because of its "premium quality and equipment, and it is a far improved drive over its predecessor," he says.
Mercedes-Benz continues to maintain a price premium over the 3 series with the C class. The C300 starts at $39,325, compared with $34,145 for BMW's entry 320i. Both prices include shipping.
Heiko Schmidt, product manager for the C class at Mercedes-Benz USA, says: "We have come a long way in the last two generations. We closed the gap with the 3 series when you benchmark to powertrain, fit and finish and especially inside with quality."
In the coming year, the C class will get a coupe and convertible designed from the ground up, derivatives that Heiko says finally will put Mercedes on a more level playing field with the 3 series.


2 is the new 3?
Consumer Reports' Fisher says the 3 series isn't the most highly rated car: "In terms of reliability, safety and luxury, there are better cars." He accuses BMW of going "a bit mainstream and backing off that fun-to-drive factor" to appeal to the market's seemingly insatiable demand for plush interiors and entertaining electronics.
For instance, the freshened 2016 3 series boasts an optional color head-up display, parallel and perpendicular parking assist, a navigation system with 3-D visualization in cities and over-the-air maps.
The smaller, less fussy 2-series coupe is what the 3 series used to be, Fisher says.
"The new BMW 3 series is a BMW 2 series -- the 235i is the most classic," he said. "It is fun to drive, luxurious and can hold its own with the luxury and livability."
In Lutz's view, the 3 series faces another challenge. He figures that in the next five years, sporty compacts will matter less as the market continues to shift to compact crossovers: "More and more, worldwide customers are abandoning sedans. If the current trend continues, they will be very rare in five years."
Laham, the Cape Cod dealer, admits some of his former 3-series customers now own the BMW X3 or X1 compact crossovers: "If they don't buy another 3, they buy a variation -- an X3 or an X1." But, he adds, "all of that technology has come off the 3 series."
Lutz says that even with changing consumer tastes and advancing competitors, the 3 leads the pack. "BMW will devote all the technology and marketing to make sure the 3 series remains premium," Lutz says. "In real terms, if it was a 9.2, most others are an 8.5 or a 7.5."